When the Market Shifts, Your Withdrawal Plan Should Too

Most people think retirement income is a straight line: save, invest, withdraw 4% per year. Done. But real life doesn’t follow neat averages—especially in times like these.

1. The 4% Rule Is a Starting Point, Not a Contract

Originally designed for a 30-year retirement in relatively stable markets, the 4% rule offers a useful benchmark—but it isn’t agile enough for today’s volatility. Relying on rigid rules can create unnecessary stress or, worse, risk depleting your savings too soon.

2. Sequence of Returns Risk Is Real

Withdrawing during early market downturns can permanently shrink your nest egg. Flexibility in your withdrawal plan helps buffer against these early losses, allowing you to adjust withdrawals based on market conditions and protect your long-term security.

3. Dynamic Spending Models Create Optionality

Flexible strategies—such as the Guyton-Klinger rules or “guardrail” approaches—let retirees take more in good years and pull back in bad ones. This adaptability supports both financial health and peace of mind, without sacrificing long-term goals.

4. Cash Buckets and Guardrails Help People Sleep at Night

Segmenting your portfolio into short-, medium-, and long-term “buckets” provides both psychological and financial stability. Knowing where your next few years of income will come from can ease anxiety, even when markets are turbulent.

Stat:
A Morningstar study found that flexible withdrawal strategies can increase portfolio longevity by up to 10 years compared to fixed rules.

Takeaway

Retirement income planning isn’t about locking into a number—it’s about adapting to life as it unfolds. The most resilient portfolios are the ones that bend, not break.

What Our Clients Are Reading